Garden Leave—Grievance

-
When an employee has a concern or grievance and as a part of the disciplinary procedure, there should be a means by which such grievances and appeals can be examined.

The right of appeal and/or opportunity for an employee to have a grievance heard by someone other than the person against whom the grievance may be lodged, should be obvious.

Under the Employment Act 2002 employers must provide a grievance procedure. In this way, not only can the employee's voice be heard, but it can provide a defence against harassment, victimisation and bullying, prejudicial behaviour, favouritism and bias, and be seen as an important aspect of the employers' commitment to DIGNITY AT WORK.

The principles of a grievance procedure are that it should provide details of:

  • how to notify the concern or (if it arises from the application of the disciplinary procedure) the appeal;

  • who to appeal to and, should it be rejected by them, details of the next and any further stages;

  • time limits that apply regarding each decision; and

  • how decisions are to be communicated.


    • Draft Wording
    If you have a grievance or have received a warning or been dismissed or have any other concern you may lodge a grievance or exercise your right of appeal under this procedure.

    1. [The Organisation] believes that grievances should be settled as quickly as possible. If you have a grievance, you should discuss it first with your immediate superior. Every effort should be made to resolve the grievance at this stage.

    2. Your superior will deal with the matter within three working days (either verbally or in writing).

    3. If you are not satisfied with your superior's decision, you may make an appeal to the next tier of manager. Again, a decision will be given within three working days.

    4. If you are still dissatisfied, you may request an interview with [a director]. A decision will be given within five working days.

    5. Finally you have a right of appeal to [the Chairman] whose decision will be final and will be given as soon as practically possible.

    6. At all meetings you have the right (if you wish) to be accompanied by a colleague.

    7. If the subject of the grievance is discrimination or harassment which involves the employee's own superior, then application for a hearing under this policy may be made to [name - for example, the Personnel Manager] who will then conduct the matter on behalf of the employee. As far as possible in these circumstances the anonymity of the employee will be protected.


    Employees have the legal right to be accompanied by a colleague at a grievance hearing. Care needs to be taken since an interchange between employee and supervision could develop into a meeting during which a grievance is lodged. In such a case, failure to invite the employee to have a colleague present could raise the question of whether the grievance hearing was validly constituted.

    Record
    The administration of the grievance procedure should mirror that of the disciplinary procedure in that at every stage full notes should be kept and that, ideally, as the grievance is progressed persons other than those already involved should try to determine the matter.

    Comments

    Post a Comment

    Popular posts from this blog

    Canteens and Rest Rooms for Employees-Cooperation, Employee's Duty Of

    -
    Canteens and Rest Rooms for Employees Key points Whether or not employers are legally-bound to provide their workers with dedicated canteens or rests room will depend in large part on the type of activity or process in which an employer is engaged. Regulation 25(5) of the Workplace (Health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992 - that apply to every workplace - states that 'suitable and sufficient facilities shall be provided for persons at work to eat meals where meals are regularly eaten in the workplace'. By way of explanation, the accompanying Approved Code of Practice points out that 'seats in work areas can be counted as eating facilities provided they are in a sufficiently clean place and there is a suitable surface on which to place food. Eating facilities', it continues, 'should include a facility for preparing or obtaining a hot drink, such as an electric kettle, a vending machine or a canteen'. Furthermore, 'workers who work
    Read more

    Dismissal for Lack of Qualifications

    -
    Image
    Key points §   'Lack of qualifications' is one of the permitted (or legitimate) reasons for dismissal listed in section 98(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The expression qualifications means any degree, diploma or other academic, technical or professional qualification relevant to the position that a dismissed employee held ( ibid. section 98(3)(b)). §   Although an employee can legitimately be dismissed for not having the qualifications needed to do his (or her) job, that is not necessarily an end to the matter. What an employment tribunal must decide is whether the dismissal was fair. Given the particular circumstances (including the size and administrative resources of his undertaking) did the employer act reasonably or unreasonably in treating the employee's lack of qualifications as a sufficient reason for dismissing him? That question, says section 98(4) of the 1996 Act, shall be determined 'in accordance with equity and the substantial merits of the case&
    Read more

    References

    -
    Key points As the High Court remarked in  Lawton v BOC Transhield Ltd  [1987] IRLR 404, an employer is under no legal obligation to give a former employee a reference. But, if he (or she) does do so, he owes a duty to that employee to take reasonable care to ensure that the opinions he expresses in it are based on accurate facts and, in so far as the reference itself states facts, that those facts are themselves accurate. When an employer approaches another employer for information and opinions about one of the latter's employees (past or present), it should be self-evident, said the court, that the employee in question has proffered his (or her) former employer's name as referee, that he is being seriously considered for employment elsewhere, that he is relying on the former employer to get his facts right, and that an adverse report would almost certainly result in his being taken off the short list or remaining unemployed for an unspecified period. In other words, th
    Read more